Thursday, October 15, 2009

Google on roids?

Google has made an unprecedented presence on the World Wide Web. It grew out of founders Larry Page and Sergey Brin's small garage office in the suburb of Menlo Park, California and grew to "20 billion dollars in only a mere month." Even since then, they have grown to be the major go-to search engine. Google however, has made a huge impact on today's web culture by redefining what a search engine does and is capable of. In fact, the article states that Google changed it status as a search company to a media company with its additions of Google maps, Gmail, Google Books, Google T.V. etc. Google has expanded the capability and bounds of a single company to essentially have no bounds. That is at least what Google would want if we lived in a perfect world. Unfortunately, or rather fortunately for other companies, we don't and Google won't be able gain a monopoly in every single market they seem to conquer like let's say, the e-book market. Google has an extensive selection of e-books on Google Books but they will have to combat other big conglomerates such as book giant Amazon who offers unsurpassed customer interaction with their customer reviews feature. Some people just visit Amazon to look at reader's reviews. Google will have to come up with ideas so new and fresh feature before it can conquer this market. Even so, it will be a challenge with tougher government regulations that could be in store for them.

As of now, I would say that Google doesn't have a monopoly despite all of the extensive areas of media that they cover. For most of their services there are alternative. People can use MapQuest for map info, Amazon for e-books, virtually every online media company has an email account system, and Apple has a TV service in one form or another. It's true that Google provides these services in a good way, but there is still a loyal and strong cohort of followers that have their allegiance aligned with these other companies which will, in effect, hamper Google's ability to gain a monopoly in any of the markets they currently serve. Given the services that Google offers and what they have in place now, it seems that they are just improving on already tapped-on ideas such as e-books which have been around since the early 2000's. They would need to come up with some idea that is so radical or strike some revolutionary deal that would enable them to take-over the management of some service. Yet, it seems highly unlikely that they will gain what Microsoft had with being the sole producer of operating systems for PC's prior to Linux. With that being said, Google's most promising technology seems to be Android with its use of open-source software to allow anyone who can think of an application for their mobile device, to add it. They are making dreams become a reality. It seems that Google has found their niche, and that it is to put the control in the hands of the customer. However, could the masses of people with this powerful technology within the grasp of their hands cause this to be a problem for corporations (including Google) in the future?

4 comments:

  1. I agree. I think Google offers very good options with most of their programs, but these do not represent a monopoly as there are popular alternatives, such as MapQuest, Amazon, and others that you mention. Google's main advantage that I see with these involve their technology and the ease of use.

    ReplyDelete
  2. The android open source software seems to be a very interesting concept to me. I am not very familiar with android but it it something that I will have to look into. Google is expanding in areas that I didn't even think they would try.

    ReplyDelete
  3. With the creation of Android, one has to wonder if google has any plans to develop an OS for PCs. It would seem to be the next logical step to invade more of Microsoft's territory. Unfortunately, with all of the proprietary software out there, I don't think that anyone will ever succeed.

    Still, it would be nice to see Bill Gates' Empire topple in my lifetime.

    ReplyDelete
  4. I agree with what you said about google's monopoly that there are other options. But the key is there is nothing that offers everything like google does. When google aquired youtube, added google doc, and now has android it made it a unique product. Each individual feature has a competitor, but not the overall.

    ReplyDelete